Funct. Mater. 2016; 23 (4): 561-569.
Substructure and orientation heterogeneity of polycrystalline aluminum and its changes during plastic deformation
V.Karazin Kharkiv National University, Svobody Sq. 4, 61022 Kharkiv, Ukraine
The results of experimental studies of the regularities of subgrain structure changing during plastic deformation of large-grained aluminum specimens with a parquet structure are presented. For most of the grains it is shown that the main substructure change has been the fragmentation of the subgrain structure, which is accompanied by an increase in the spectral width of misorientations. The effect of a dispersal of grain boundaries has been found and the mechanism of such dispersal is defined. The mechanism of the rotation of individual grains during deformation of the specimen and the subgrain structure role in such rotation are investigated. It is shown in experiment that specific and consistent restructuring of the subgrain structure took place in the individual grains during deformation of the specimen. It led to a change in crystallographic orientation of the grain, on the one hand, and to the relative deformation of the grain, which was significantly higher than the relative deformation of the entire specimen, on the other hand. Fine block structure with a wide spectrum of misorientations which changed during deformation of the grain was found near the boundaries of such grains. The presence of such a structure near grain boundaries played an accommodative role and excluded the possibility of discontinuities in grain and grain boundaries during deformation of the specimen.
1. H.P.Beck, G.Clicque, H.Nau, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 536, 35 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19865360505
2. B.V.Beznosikov, RAN Sibirskoe Otdelenie Institut Fiziki, Preprint No.830 F, Krasnoyarsk (2005).
3. A.A.Merkulov, L.I.Isaenko, V.M.Pashkov et al., Zh. Strukturnoy Himii, 46, 106 (2005).
4. A.M.Tkachuk, S.Ivanova, L.Isaenko et al., Acta Phys. Polon A, 95, 381 (1999). https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.95.381
5. A.M.Tkachuk, S.I. Ivanova, L.I.Isayenko et al., Opt. i Spektr., 95, 416 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1613006
6. V.A.Pustovalov, I.N.Ogorodnikov, N.S.Bastrikova et al., Opt. i Spektr., 101, 247 (2006).
7. V.A.Pustovarov, I.N.Ogorodnikov, N.S.Kuzmina et al., Fiz. Tverd. Tela, 47, 1510 (2005).
8. S.V.Melnikova, L.I.Isaenko, V.M.Pashkov, I.V.Pevnev, Fiz. Tverd. Tela, 47, 319 (2005).
9. L.I.Isaenko, S.V.Melnikova, A.A.Merkulov et al., Fiz. Tverd. Tela, 51, 554 (2009).
10. O.N.Yunakova, V.K.Miloslavskii, E.N.Kovalenko, V.V.Kovalenko, Fiz. Nizk. Temp., 40, 888 (2014).
11. O.N.Yunakova, V.K.Miloslavskii, E.N.Kovalenko, Opt. i Spektr., 112, 90 (2012).
12. O.N.Yunakova, V.K.Miloslavskii, E.N.Kovalenko, V.V.Kovalenko, Fiz. Nizk. Temp., 41, 830 (2015).
13. M.Cola, V.Massarotti, R.Riccardi, C.Sinistri, Z. Naturforsch, 26 a, 1328 (1971).
14. I.T.Goronovskiy, Yu.P.Nazarenko, E.F.Nekryach, Kratkiy Spravochnik po Himii, Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1987) [in Russian].
15. O.N.Yunakova, V.K.Miloslavskii, E.N.Kovalenko, Optika i Spectrosc., 104, 631 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X08040115
16. A.F.Malysheva, V.G.Plekhanov, Optika i Spectrosc., 34, 527 (1973).
17. J.Kanbe, H.Onuki, R.Onaka, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 43, 1280 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.43.1280
18. R.Kink, T.Avarmaa, V.Kisandt et al., J. Phys. C, 10, 693 (1998).
19. K.Schmitt, Phys. Stat. Sol. (b), 135, 389 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2221350138
20. M.Schreiber, Y.Toyasawa, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 51, 1528 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.51.1528