Funct. Mater. 2021; 28 (4): 713-719
Influence of modification of surgical sutures with film coatings based on chitosan, polyvinyl alcohol and Na-carboxymethylcellulose dialdehyde on their capillary and physico-mechanical properties
Institute of Applied Problems of Physics and Biophysics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 3 Vasilya Stepanchenka Str., 03142 Kyiv, Ukraine
The study of capillarity for polycaproamide braided sutures of metric sizes No. 4 and No. 5 before and after modification by coating based on chitosan, polyvinyl alcohol and Na-carboxymethylcellulose dialdehyde was carried out. It was found that the capillarity of the original braided polycaproamide sutures increases with increasing their metric size. The capillarity of the polycaproamide sutures decreases by 6-10 times after applying the modifying coating. The maximum decrease in the capillarity is achieved by additional modification of the coating with a solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate, which leads to a maximum increase in the contact angle. The influence of the coating on the physical and mechanical properties of the original and modified polycaproamide sutures has been established. It is shown that the applied coating leads to a decrease in the tensile strength and an increase in the relative elongation at break of polycaproamide sutures. The obtained values for sutures of metric size No. 5 are within the allowable requirements of the USP. The results of the study can be used to create surgical suture material with improved performance characteristics and a lower probability of developing implant-associated complications when used in the field of reconstructive plastic and abdominal surgery.
1. N.van Leeuwen, J.B.Trimbos, Gynecol. Surg., 9, 433 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-012-0753-5 |
||||
2. O.A.Molokova, A.I.Kecherukov, F.Sh.Aliev et al., Bull. Exp. Biol. Med., 143, 767 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-007-0236-2 |
||||
3. D.Geiger, E.-S.Debus, U.E.Ziegler et al., Surg. Infect., 6, 377 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2005.6.377 |
||||
4. V.A.Zhukovskii, Fibre Chem., 40, 208 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10692-008-9039-0 |
||||
5. G.M.Semenov, V.L.Petrishin, M.V.Kovshova, Surgical Suture, Piter, St.P. (2008) [in Russian]. | ||||
6. V.E.Rykalina, S.I.Shkurenko, E.V.Monakhova et al., Fibre Chem., 43, 68 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10692-011-9309-0 |
||||
7. X.Chen, D.Hou, X.Tang et al., J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 50, 160 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.013 |
||||
8. G.Zhang, J.Hu, T.Ren, P.Zhu, Polymers, 12, 1630 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081630 |
||||
9. A.Obermeier, J.Schneider, S.Wehner et al., PLOS ONE, 9, e101426 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101426 |
||||
10. Sh.Mohebbi, M.N.Nezhad, P.Zarrintaj et al., Curr. Stem. Cell. Res. Ther., 14, 93 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2174/1574888X13666180912142028 |
||||
11. B.R.Rizeq, N.N.Younes, K.Rasool, G.K.Nasrallah, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20, 5776 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20225776 |
||||
12. J.E.S.A.Menezes, H.S.dosSantos, M.K.A.Ferreira, J. Mol. Struct., 1199, 126968 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.126968 |
||||
13. K.Erol, M.Bolat, D.Tatar et al., J. Mol. Struct., 1200, 127060 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.127060 |
||||
14. F.Ullah, F.Javed, M.H.A.Kudus et al., Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem., 9, 4452 (2019). https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC96.452457 |
||||
15. P.Negi, G.Sharma, C.Verma et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 230, Art. No. 115659 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115659 |
||||
16. O.L.Shanmugasundaram, J. Text. Appar. Technol. Manag., 5, 1 (2006). | ||||
17. V.Crescenzi, A.Francescangeli, A.Taglienti et al., Biomacromolecules, 4, 1045 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0340669 |
||||
18. M.Changdao, G.Jimin, L.Xinying et al., Food. Hydrocoll., 27, 22 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.09.005 |
||||
19. L.Munster, J.Vicha, J.Klofac et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 198, 181 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.035 |
||||
20. X.Jiang, Z.Yang, Y.Peng et al., Carbohyd. Polym., 137, 632 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.078 |
||||
21. T.G.Asere, S.Mincke, K.Folens et al., React. Funct. Polym., 141, 145 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2019.05.008 |
||||
22. M.B.Fedorov, G.A.Vikhoreva, N.R.Kil'deeva et al., Fibre Chem., 38, 475 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10692-006-0113-1 |
||||
23. V.A.Volkov, A.A.Ageev, Sci. Eur., 6, 15 (2016). | ||||
24. V.A.Volkov, A.A.Ageev, T.M.Kuzmina, Des. Technol., 48, 41 (2015). | ||||
25. V.A.Volkov, B.V.Bulushev, A.A.Ageev, Colloid J., 65, 523 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025141523629 |
||||
26. M.Rinaudo, N.R.Kil'deeva, V.G.Babak, Zh. Obshch.Khimii, 78, 2239 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363208110455 |
||||
27. L.B.Petrovic, J.R.Milinkovic, J.L.Fraj et al., J. Serb. Chem. Soc., 81, 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC151119024P |
||||
28. R.Barreiro-Iglesias, C.Alvarez-Lorenzo, A.Concheiro, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 82, 499 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-005-0923-z |
||||