Funct. Mater. 2022; 29 (3): 401-407.

doi:https://doi.org/10.15407/fm29.03.401

Investigation on the brittleness of ultra-high strength cement-based materials

Xuefeng Yuan1, Gang Liao2

1Taizhou Polytechnical College, 225300 Jiangsu Taizhou, China
2Department of Traffic and Municipal Engineering, Sichuan College of Architectural Technology, 610399 Sichuan Chengdu, China

Abstract: 

The aim of this paper is to investigate the factors influencing on the brittleness of ultra-high strength cement-based materials (UHSC). A conventional method was applied to prepare UHSC using normal raw materials. The basic mechanical properties including compressive strength, flexural strength, splitting tensile strength, and elastic modulus were measured. Fracture parameters, such as fracture energy and characteristic length, were determined to evaluate the brittleness of UHSC. The results shows that UHSC has high values of compressive strength over 130 MPa and flexural strength over 20 MPa; the fracture energy and characteristic length of UHSC are lower than that of normal concrete, indicating the high brittleness of UHSC. The strength and brittleness decrease with increasing the water-to-binder ratio. High temperature curing can not only increase strength, but also reduce brittleness. The addition of silica fume may be one of the main reasons for the high brittleness of UHSC. The addition of fly ash can significantly improve the mechanical properties and reduce the brittleness of UHSC.

Keywords: 
UHSC, mechanical properties, brittleness, fracture energy, characteristic length.
References: 
1. C.Shi, Z.Wu, J.Xiao rt al., Construction and Building Materials, 101, 741 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.088
 
2. S.Abbas, A.M.Soliman, M.L.Nehdi, Construction and Building Materials, 75, 429 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.017
 
3. P.-C.Aitcin, Cem. Concr. Res., 30, 1349 (2000).
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00365-3
 
4. J.Walraven, Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 7, 145 (2009).
https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.7.145
 
5. J.Brooks, P.Wainwright, Magazine of Concrete Research, 35, 205 (1983).
https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1983.35.125.205
 
6. P.Richard, M.H.Cheyrezy, Special Publication, 144, 507 (1994).
 
7. F.De Larrard, T.Sedran, Cem. Concr. Res., 24, 997 (1994).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(94)90022-1
 
8. Y.Du, H.-H.Qi, S.-S.Huang, J.R.Liew, Construction and Building Materials, 258, 120334 (2020).
 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120334
 
9. C.P.Vernet, MRS Bull., 29, 324 (2004).
https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2004.98
 
10. J.Liew, M.Xiong, D.Xiong, International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 3, 215 (2014).
 
11. M.Chen, W.Zheng, X.Hou, Functional Materials, 24, 082 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.15407/fm24.01.082
 
12. H.Cao, C.Wang, C.Shao, L.Zhu, Functional Materials, 26, 784 (2019).
 
https://doi.org/10.15407/fm26.04.784
 
13. A.Yang, H.Wu, Functional Materials, 26, 795 (2019).
 
https://doi.org/10.15407/fm26.04.795
 

Current number: