Funct. Mater. 2020; 27 (1): 147-158.
Extended quasi-correlated orbitals with long-range effects: Application to organic single-molecule electronics
STC "Institute for Single Crystals", National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 60 Nauky Ave., 61001 Kharkiv, Ukraine
The previously given quasi-correlated tight-binding (QCTB) π-electron scheme is generalized in a very simple way. We now include long-range electronic effects while retaining, to a certain extent, a tight-binding (TB) basis of the theory. The thus extended quasi-correlated (EQC) method is applied, along with QCTB and usual TB schemes, to compute and analyze Green's functions (GF) and related quantities needed for molecular electronics theory. Several interpretative indexes are suggested (distance correlator, collectivity measure and others) for analyzing GF. This new scheme is used for describing π-electron conductance of large-scale graphene-type molecules. We show that lacking the long-range effects in TB leads to drastic consequences for electron transport (overestimation of conductance by orders of magnitude, nonphysical very large long-distance transmission etc.)
1. Molecular and Nano Electronics: Analysis, Design and Simulation, ed. by J.M.Seminario, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007). | ||||
2. Handbook on Nano and Molecular Electronics, ed. by S.E.Lyshevski, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2007). | ||||
3. Computational Methods for Large Systems: Electronic Structure Approaches for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, ed. by J.R.Reimers, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey (2011). | ||||
4. K.Hirose, N.Kobayashi, Quantum Transport Calculations for Nanosystems, Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore (2014). https://doi.org/10.1201/b16679 |
||||
5. J.P.Launay, M.Verdaguer, Electrons in Molecules: From Basic Principles to Molecular Electronics, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297788.001.0001 |
||||
6. J.C.Cuevas, E.Scheer, Molecular Electronics: An Introduction to Theory and Experiment, World Scientific, Singapore (2010). https://doi.org/10.1142/7434 |
||||
7. Y.Tsuji, E.Estrada, R.Movassagh, R.Hoffmann, Chem. Rev., 118, 4887 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00733 |
||||
8. A.V.Luzanov, Funct. Mater., 26, 152 (2019). https://doi.org/10.15407/fm26.01.152 |
||||
9. A.V.Luzanov, in press 2019. | ||||
10. Y.G.Smeyers, L.Doreste-Suarez, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 7, 687 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.560070406 |
||||
11. K.Yates, Huckel Molecular Orbital Theory, Academic Press, New York (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-768850-3.50005-5 |
||||
12. A.V.Luzanov, Funct. Mater., 21, 437 (2014). https://doi.org/10.15407/fm21.04.437 |
||||
13. A.V.Luzanov, in: Practical Aspects of Computational Chemistry IV, ed. by J.Leszczynski, M.K.Shukla, Springer, New York (2016), p.151. | ||||
14. A.V.Luzanov, F.Plasser, A.Das, H.Lischka, J. Chem. Phys., 146, 064106 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4975196 |
||||
15. S.G.Davison, A.T.Amos, J. Chem. Phys., 43, 2223 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1697114 |
||||
16. J.A.Pople, Trans. Faraday Soc., 49, 1375 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1039/tf9534901375 |
||||
17. J.A.Pople, N.S.Hush, Trans. Faraday. Soc., 51, 600 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1039/tf9555100600 |
||||
18. J.Rincon, K.Hallberg, A.A.Aligia, S.Ramasesha, Phys. Rev. Lett., 103, 266807 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.266807 |
||||
19. J.P.Bergfield, G.C.Solomon, C.A.Stafford, M.A.Ratner, Nano Letters, 11, 2759 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl201042m |
||||
20. K.G.L.Pedersen, M.Strange, M.Leijnse et al., Phys. Rev. B, 90, 125413 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.125413 |
||||
21. G.C.Solomon, J.P.Bergfield, C.A.Stafford, M.A.Ratner, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol., 2, 862 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.2.95 |
||||
22. Y.Tsuji, R.Hoffmann, R.Movassagh, S.Datta, J. Chem. Phys., 141, 224311 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4903043 |
||||
23. E.Estrada, in: Quantum Chemistry at the Dawn of the 21st Century, ed. by T.Chakraborty, R.Carbo-Dorca, Apple Academic Press, Oakville (2018), p.445. | ||||
24. M.G.Everett, Methodological Innovations, 9, 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799116630662 |
||||
25. A.V.Luzanov, V.E.Umanski, Theor. Experim. Chem., 13, 162 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00520556 |
||||
26. A.V.Luzanov, O.A.Zhikol, Int. J. Quant. Chem., 104, 167 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.20511 |
||||
27. C.J.O.Verzijl, J.S.Seldenthuis, J.M.Thijssen, J. Chem. Phys., 138, 094102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4793259 |
||||
28. L.-Y.Hsu, H.Rabitz, J. Chem. Phys., 145, 234702 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4972131 |
||||
29. S.-M.Jhan, B.-Y.Jin, J. Chem. Phys., 147, 194106 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4999073 |
||||
30. P.W.Anderson, D.J.Thouless, E.Abrahams, D.S.Fisher, Phys. Rev. B, 22, 3519 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.22.3519 |
||||
31. D.S.Fisher, P.A.Lee, Phys. Rev. B, 23, 6851 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.23.6851 |
||||
32. M.Reznikov, R.de-Picciotto, M.Heiblum et al., Superlattices and Microstructures, 23, 901 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1006/spmi.1997.0559 |
||||
33. A.V.Luzanov, J. Struct. Chem., 55, 799 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022476614050011 |
||||
34. A.V.Luzanov, Funct. Mater., 23, 599 (2016). https://doi.org/10.15407/fm23.04.420 |
||||
35. A.V.Luzanov, in: Nanophysics, Nanophotonics, and Applications. Springer Proceedings in Physics, v.210, ed. by O.Fesenko, L.Yatsenko, Springer, Cham (2018), p.161. | ||||
36. T.T.Heikkila, The Physics of Nanoelectronics, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013). |