Funct. Mater. 2024; 31 (4): 630-637.

doi:https://doi.org/10.15407/fm31.04.630

Prospects of using MOF/TiO₂ nanocomposites for photocatalytic degradation of pesticides

Zhou Zhentao^1,2, A. Sukhoivanenko¹, T. Dontsova¹

¹National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv 03056, Ukraine
²State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Disease and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant protection, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Science, Beijing 100193, China

Abstract:

Cleaning water bodies from fourth-generation pesticides is an urgent problem today. In this study, a series of nanocomposites based on MOF (NH2-MIL-125) and commercial titanium (IV) oxide P25 were synthesized and characterized, and their photocatalytic activity towards imidacloprid was determined. MOF and MOF/TiO₂ composites were synthesized by a simple solvothermal method. The synthesized MOF and MOF/TiO₂ composite were characterized by XRD, electron microscopy, UV-visible, infrared and FTIR spectroscopy, and TGA analysis. The studies showed that TiO₂ and MOF have typical properties, and the properties of the composite were similar to those of MOF. The found band gap values of MOF and MOF/TiO₂ composite (2.68 eV and 2.58 eV) indicate their potential use visible light photocatalytic processes. The photocatalytic activity study indicates a two-step degradation of imidacloprid, which is quite efficient for the MOF/TiO₂ composite with the highest titanium (IV) oxide content, reaching almost 100% after 2 h our of photocatalytic reaction.

Keywords:

MOF/TiO<sub>2</sub> nanocomposites, Metal-organic frameworks, Titanium (IV) oxide, Photocatalysis, Pesticides, Imidacloprid

Full text in PDF

References:

1. Mu H, Yang X, Wang K, et al., Chemosphere, 326, 138428 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138428

2. Zhang X, Huang Y, Chen WJ, et al., Environ. Res., 218, 114953 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114953

3. Mojiri A, Zhou JL, Robinson B, et al., Chemosphere, 253, 126646 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126646

4. Asghar A, Mabarak S, Ashraf B, et al., Inorg. Chem. Commun., 159, 111790 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2023.111790

5. Roshani M, Nematollahi D, Ansari A, et al., Chemosphere, 346, 140597 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140597

6. Pirsaheb M, Moradi N., RSC Adv., 10, 7396-7423 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA11025A

7. GOH PS, Ahmad NA, Wong TW, et al., Chemosphere, 307(3), 136018 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136018

8. Kuzminchuk A, Burmak A, Litynska M, et al., Appl. Nanosci., 13, 5335-5343 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-023-02792-8

9. Dontsova T, Kyrii S, Yanushevska O, et al., Chem. Pap., 76, 7667-7683 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-022-02433-4

10. Kutuzova A, Dontsova T, Kwapinski W, et al., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst ., 751, 28-40 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/15421406.2022.2073526

11. Ribeiro AR, Nunes OC, Pereira MFR, et al., Environ. Int., 75, 33-51 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.027

12. Bartolomeu M, Neves MGPMS, Faustino MAF, et al., Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 17, 1573-1598 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8pp00249e

13. Varma KS, Tayade RJ, Shah KJ, et al., Water-Energy Nexus, 3, 46-61 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wen.2020.03.008

14. Wei Z, Liu J, Shangguan W., Chinese J. Catal., 41(10), 1440-1450 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63448-0

15. Dontsova TA, Kutuzova AS, Bila KO, et al., J. Nanomater., 2020, 8349480 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8349480

16. Kutuzova A, Dontsova T, Kwapinski W., J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater ., 30, 3060-3072 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-020-01467-z

17. Kutuzova A, Dontsova T., Proccedings of the 2018 IEEE 8th International Conference Nanomaterials: Application & Properties, 2018 Sep 9-14, Zatoka, Ukraine, 1-5 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/NAP.2018.8914747

18. Kutuzova A, Dontsova T., Proccedings of the 2017 IEEE 7th International Conference Nanomaterials: Application & Properties, 2017 Sep 10-15, Odessa, Ukraine, 01NNPT02-1-01NNPT02-5 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/NAP.2017.8190182

19. Fagan R, McCormack DE, Dionysiou DD, et al., Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process., 42(1), 2-14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2015.07.052

20. Kyrii S, Dontsova T, Kosogina I, et al., Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(6(112)) 67-74 (2021). https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.238347

21. Abdurahman MH, Abdullah AZ, Shoparwe NF., Chem. Eng. J., 413, 127412 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127412

22. Majumdar A, Pal A., Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 22, 11-42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01766-1

23. Abbasnia A, Zarei A, Yeganeh M, et al., Inorg. Chem. Commun., 145, 109959 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2022.109959

24. Batten SR, Neville SM, Turner DR., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 48(27), 4890-4891 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200902588

25. Jiao L, Seow JYR, Skinner WS, et al., Mater. Today, 27, 43-68 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.10.038

26. Falcaro P, Ricco R, Yazdi A, et al., Coord. Chem. Rev., 307(2), 237-254 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2015.08.002

27. Karthik P, Balaraman E, Neppolian B., Catal. Sci. Technol., 8, 3286-3294 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CY00604K

28. Horiuchi Y, Toyao T, Saito M, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C., 116(39), 20848-20853 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp3046005

29. Slater AG, Cooper AI., Science, 348(6238) (2015). DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa8075. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8075

30. Forster PM, Thomas PM, Cheetham AK., Chem. Mater., 14(1), 17-20 (2002). D https://doi.org/10.1021/cm010820q

31. George P, Dhabarde NR, Chowdhury P., Mater. Lett., 186, 151-154 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.09.099

32. Devic T, Serre C., Chem. Soc. Rev., 43, 6097-6115 (2014). DOI: 10.1039/C4CS00081A. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00081A

33. Dong J, Cui P, Shi PF, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc ., 137(51), 15988-15991 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b10000

34. Low JJ, Benin AI, Jakubczak P, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131(43), 15834-15842 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9061344

35. Wang H, Yuan X, Wu Y, et al., J. Hazard. Mater., 286, 187-194 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.11.039

36. González-Burciaga LA, Núñez-Núñez CM, Morones-Esquivel MM, et al., Catalysts, 10(1), 118 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10010118

37. Yoon JW, Kim DH, Kim JH, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 244, 511-518 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.11.057

38. Dontsova T, Ivanenko I, Astrelin I., Springer Proceedings in Physics: Nanoplasmonics, Nano-Optics, Nanocomposites, and Surface Studies, 167, 275-293 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18543-9_19

39. Fidalgo A, Letichevsky S, Santos BF., J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 405, 112870 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112870

40. Al-Amin M, Dey S, Rashid T, et al., International Journal of Latest Research in Engineering and Technology, 2, 14-21 (2016).

41. Castellanos NJ, Rojas ZM, Camargo HA, et al., Transit. Met. Chem ., 44, 77-87 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11243-018-0271-z

Current number:

31-4

Вы здесь

Форма поиска

Funct. Mater. 2024; 31 (4): 630-637.

Current number: