Funct. Mater. 2026; 32 (1): 24-32.
Prediction of spin-polarization characteristics of Al@Si -doped single-walled (6,0) SiC nanotubes
1 Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University, 20 Azalig Ave., AZ-1010, Baku, Azerbaijan
2 Khazar University, 41 Mehseti Str, AZ1096 Baku, Azerbaijan
3 Department of Physics, Mary Matha Arts and Science College, Mananthavady, Kannur University, Kerala, India-670645
4 Department of Chemistry, Nirmalagiri College, Kannur Kerala, India, 670701
In this study, we examine the impact of aluminum substitution on the structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of single-walled (6,0) silicon carbide nanotubes using spin-polarized density functional theory calculations. The introduction of Al into the nanotube lattice significantly alters its electronic structure, leading to a transition toward half-metallic behavior. Specifically, the spin-up channel retains a semiconducting nature, while the spin-down channel becomes metallic, indicating a clear spin-dependent conductivity. The partial density of states analysis reveals that the electronic states near the Fermi level are dominated by carbon p-orbitals, with additional contributions from the d-orbitals of the aluminum dopant. Spin-resolved charge density distributions further show the emergence of a net magnetic moment of approximately 1.0 μB, which is mainly localized on the carbon atoms adjacent to the Al impurity. A comparison of total energies for ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic configurations indicates that the antiferromagnetic state is energetically more stable and therefore represents the ground state of the system. Taken together, these findings suggest that Al@Si-doped (6,0) SiC nanotubes possess a combination of half-metallic characteristics and stable magnetic ordering, making them promising materials for spintronic applications such as spin filters and antiferromagnetic memory devices.
1. Zhang W., Zhang F., Zhang Z., Lu S., Yang Y., Sci. China Phys. Mech. 53, 1582 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-010-4089-8
2. Madar R., Nature 430, 974 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/430974a
3. Alam K. M., Ray A. K., Phys. Rev. B 77, 035436 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.035436
4. Baumeier B., Krüger P., Pollmann J., Phys. Rev. B 76, 085407 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.085407
5. Ponraj J. S., Dhanabalan S. C., Attolini G., Salviati G., Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 41, 430 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2016.1150806
6. Santos E., Ayuela A., Sanchez-Portal D., New J. Phys. 12, 053012 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/5/053012
7. Zhao J. X., Ding Y. H., J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 2558 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp073722m
8. Heidarzadeh H., Opt. Quant. Electron. 51, 32 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-019-1742-y
9. Mulatu A. T., Nigussa K. N., Deja L. D., Optical Mater. 134, 113094 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2022.113094
10. Vatankhah Ch., Badehian H. A., Optik 237, 166740 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.166740
11. Ibaeva R. Z., Jafarova V. N., Eminova V. I., Scurtu I. C., Lupu S., J. Nanopart. Res. 26, 23 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-024-06109-w
12. Asadullayeva S. G., Jahangirli Z. A., Eur. Phys. J. B 98, 142 (2025).
10.1140/epjb/s10051-025-00990-7
13. Jafarova V. N., Eminova V. I., Musaev M. A., Scurtu I. C., Technium 26, 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v26i.12149
14. Tien N. T., Thao P. T. B., Jafarova V. N., Roy D. D., Silicon, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-024-03127-0
15. Rzayeva S., Jafarova V. N., Roy D. D., Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 197, 109702 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2025.109702
16. Rzayeva S., Jafarova V. N., Turkish Comput. Theor. Chem. 9, 112 (2025). https://doi.org/10.33435/tcandtc.1535679
17. Rzayeva S., Jafarova V. N., J. Polytechnic 28, 947 (2025). https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.1536597
18. Wu A. Q., Song Q. G., Yang L., Adv. Mater. Res. 510, 747 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.510.747
19. Kohn W., Sham L. J., Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133
20. Cococcioni M., de Gironcoli S., Phys. Rev. B 71, 035105 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.71.035105